Social
See also Platforms, Thinking, Language, Social web
to do various things with
General
Groups
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_group
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_group
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_group_(sociology)
Organisations
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisational_theory
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_theory
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_architecture
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_structure
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_development
Transparency
- http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/10/why_radical_transparency_is_good_business.html
- http://www.businessinsider.com/radical-transparency-in-small-business-2013-1
other to sort
- http://stackoverflow.com/tags/synonyms?tab=master&filter=all
- http://www.brianbondy.com/stackexchange/#expected-age
- http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4412245
Dead tree
Depth
Marketing
Awareness and attention
- http://www.greenchameleon.com/gc/blog_detail/the_war_between_awareness_and_memory/
- http://blog.mediumequalsmessage.com/goodbye-ubiquitous-digital-service
- http://www.twitip.com/twitter-is-a-tool-for-ambient-awareness/
- http://digitalculture-ed.net/tonym/2009/10/11/ambient-collegiality/
Bookmarking
Other
From old wiki:
Pipedream
older ideas
- http://web.archive.org/web/20110120002447/
- http://www.typewith.me/the-web-we-need - via anon activism
Social news idea
While I'm here (sending feedback for the new digg), my wishlist would be for;
- Reddit style voting meets Slashdot comment categories, with social bookmark tagging for both users and groups/communities. *
Between upvoting and commenting, there are other types of actions that can be performed on items, like flagging as a favourite.
To add a better social bookmarking management system (better than Reddit search!), if a user could either;
- Click to Digg - (Click to thumbs-down/whatever is optional for communities, or like Hacker News) - Click to Favourite to own bookmark list -- And Tag, like del.icio.us, pinboard.in - Also, click to "Notice", as in not like the user "Diggs" or "Likes" the content of the article, and not that they want to bother saving it to Favourites, but a touch in the sence of a the *nix command, or a 'poke' to the issue embodies in the linked to page.
So, on the page, in ASCII;
This is the title of the link! 324 diggs/94 undiggs (small url) 863 noticed [++] [*] [~] [Tag:] [img thumb/whatever]
This is the title of another link! 243 diggs/213 undiggs (small url) 546 noticed [++] [*] [~] [Tag:] [img thumb/whatever]
(the buttons representing 'digg', 'favourite/save', 'notice' and 'tag:'
the tag textarea expands on clickingm like the stackexchange search box, and does auto-complete for a users tags, with suggestions from the global tags, like del.icio.us. personal taxonomy can be cached locally for users.)
ALSO - reposts in different communities can tie back to a global site dashboard listing related taxonomies, from groups and users who favourite the link publically
So
- Bottom up social tagging link topic clustering
- Some communities have taxonomies moderated
- Moderated taxonomies could be linked with Linked Data, DPpedia, etc.
- So some serious bits of the site, some open and silly bits
- Bits and bobs displayed in a timeline format (D3.js?), arrows between concepts in a postcyberpunk style semantic news and search display
- Paid access for high-volume API calls
Group types
from old wiki
Groups for collaboration on and sharing of conversation, news, code, media, services, etc.
- Active = Groups as in membership.
- Who can 'join'?
- Open = Cost of entry is participation.
- Closed = Some form of new-member rules.
- What output can people see?
- Public = Open process, easily forkable.
- Private = Group or subgroup curates output, hidden process. Trust?
- Who can 'join'?
- Passive = Groups as in topics of interest.
- Web of semantically related topics and ideas.
- Mining and 'routing' of relevant related content
Individual hubs could federate the service they wished (widgets, social aggregation, files, etc) in a manner that could be open or hidden. Tunnelled inter-darknet connections between anonymised users and services.
Process consensus-holders