Meta

From Things and Stuff Wiki
Revision as of 19:25, 3 July 2016 by Milk (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search




.

this

no words. that's two words.

that too shall pass.

crash



action about action


nomenclature / taxonomy

(forces, energy, matter, physics, chemistry, biology, mind (being, meta), maths/gestalt, social, technology, tradition, etc.)

there is no truth, just suitable encoding

(love is important!)



open packaging that never ends

figure/ground, arch, form bottom (centre) to top (base, other potential perspective poles, paths or groups), in out to side, inside a sphere so all is facing toward, with rotate + zoom (and other perspectives)), transition and time, visual with woven trees of text, knotted and colour


simulated annealing?!


...

closed / open usage / domains. [in]finite intersubjective discourse flowing fluxing to almost all. then everything else.

dots, dashes, fields, cobordism, fractal tunnels, etc.




comments about, comments about similar/relationship


description/prescription

allowing/direction

nonsense, action about action



loops around, loops abound, topois (topos/topoi/topsoil) of life, writing theirself (spoken), up and down, strange subtle symbols, grouped real and imagined, a field to exdream (s), in all and nothing can be found

continuum of poles and points

diversity over disorder

turanga/lila


...


"The universe does not owe you anything."

"Consider laughter: it is the highest emotion, for it can contain any of the others from ecstasy to grief. It has no opposite. Crying is merely an underdeveloped form of it which cleanses the eyes and summons assistance to infants. Laughter is the only tenable attitude in a universe which is a joke played upon itself." - Peter J. Carroll

"Can't smile? Try laughing." - paraphrase? Bhante Vimalaramsi

"Laughter is ever young, whereas tragedy, except the very highest of all, quickly becomes haggard." Margaret Sackville

Take the ego out of the equation - laughing with and at become the same.

lean back into the pain (posture)

  • "authorenticity"

focus on

internal/external

relation al

mindfulness flows through the spaced repetition of a continual and holistic moment

robust experience

plenumial currents


bliss and beats and peace


give up on one reference point for

everythingiseverythingeverything

iisiisiisiseverything


laugh and (or) peace

when to stop, more virtuous than innocence


opposites / steps (?)


reflection, refactoring, enfolding, navigating

reflection - how can the form of a text connect to reality?

refactor - programming/wiki, working in a better form

enfold - lots of things mean the same



ambiguity is fine + i don't know/mindread/have the time energy to get upset at my or others assumptions or projections" mindset.


musing on the concept of "the judge, the judge of the judge, the judge of the judge of the judge.". rephrase that with angry, jaded, fearful, etc. moving to the position that the metaness might distill but doesn't doesn't stack up to change the 'mode' of the processing of a situation. that doesn't make it unnatural or bad, but it seems generally inefficient in deconstructing unhelpful loops and reflections, and that reprocessing through something like NVC or an "attend and befriend, rather than react (fight, flight, freeze)" mindset is an easier path to raising consciousness. this is just my personal take so far; i'm more confident with an "


(to totally edit

ignoring can certainly work and be worth it - it can be being at peace with not elevating or entangling with a situation, afford a safer space for oneself, and is something that can help someone reflect. my quandry is that, in a full-on mode, like with a full-on positivity (that ignores talking about upset feelings), it cuts off certain potentially efficient workable resolutions, but, saying that, still, it is often the best and healthiest response, and it doesn't reason out not to have peace with anothers attempt at peace. i guess by "full-on" i mean that there can be additional thoughts that arise that ultimately re-enforce barriers to understanding, but that's, like, several steps away from my original premise, and feck, human relationships are a terribly (wonderfuly) complex thing, so all this might just be my own 'additional thoughts' from my subjective experience and perception. but fuck it, experience isn't enough to learn, you have to sometimes reflect (and vocalise) to better work out things. :)