Social

From Things and Stuff Wiki
Revision as of 01:21, 15 May 2013 by Milk (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


See also Platforms, Thinking, Writing

to sort/merge with Organisation and split out again

General

Groups

Organisations

Communication

Media

New media

Networks

Digital literacy

other to sort

Automation

irc bots, reddit

Dead tree

Metadata

Data ownership

Analytics

Transparency

Trust

Encryption

Privacy

Practices

TOR, etc

Legal

Anonymity

Depth

Marketing

Awareness and attention

Tools

Technology

Negotiation

Culture

"challenging sensitively"

Cooperative

  • Cultivate.Coop is an online hub for pooling knowledge and resources on cooperatives. It is a space to collect free information for those interested in cooperatives and where people can build useful educational tools for the co-op community.

Open source development

Process

Consensus

See anarchism, horizontalism, etc.

Debate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogerian_argument

to fix with communication

Structured debate

Committee based

Agile

services;

Scrum

XP

(two [heads] are better than one, do the techno man)

Lean

Gamification

TRIZ

Safe spaces

SMS

Event management

Ticketing

Other

From old wiki:

Social platforms

See also Twitter, Facebook

Facebook

DataPortability / OStatus / Federated Social Web

tooo sooort

july 2010

august 2010

other

2013;

Semantic

Open Graph

OpenID

PubsubHubBub

OAuth

OpenSocial

BrowserID

to sort

  • http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs Tahoe-LAFS is a Free and Open cloud storage system. It distributes your data across multiple servers. Even if some of the servers fail or are taken over by an attacker, the entire filesystem continues to function correctly, preserving your privacy and security.

Discussion

Old

New

here we go again

Hyperlocal

Pipedream

Social news idea

While I'm here (sending feedback for the new digg), my wishlist would be for;

  • Reddit style voting meets Slashdot comment categories, with social bookmark tagging for both users and groups/communities. *

Between upvoting and commenting, there are other types of actions that can be performed on items, like flagging as a favourite.

To add a better social bookmarking management system (better than Reddit search!), if a user could either;

- Click to Digg - (Click to thumbs-down/whatever is optional for communities, or like Hacker News) - Click to Favourite to own bookmark list -- And Tag, like del.icio.us, pinboard.in - Also, click to "Notice", as in not like the user "Diggs" or "Likes" the content of the article, and not that they want to bother saving it to Favourites, but a touch in the sence of a the *nix command, or a 'poke' to the issue embodies in the linked to page.

So, on the page, in ASCII;

This is the title of the link! 324 diggs/94 undiggs (small url) 863 noticed [++] [*] [~] [Tag:] [img thumb/whatever]

This is the title of another link! 243 diggs/213 undiggs (small url) 546 noticed [++] [*] [~] [Tag:] [img thumb/whatever]

(the buttons representing 'digg', 'favourite/save', 'notice' and 'tag:'

the tag textarea expands on clickingm like the stackexchange search box, and does auto-complete for a users tags, with suggestions from the global tags, like del.icio.us. personal taxonomy can be cached locally for users.)

ALSO - reposts in different communities can tie back to a global site dashboard listing related taxonomies, from groups and users who favourite the link publically

So

  • Bottom up social tagging link topic clustering
  • Some communities have taxonomies moderated
  • Moderated taxonomies could be linked with Linked Data, DPpedia, etc.
  • So some serious bits of the site, some open and silly bits
  • Bits and bobs displayed in a timeline format (D3.js?), arrows between concepts in a postcyberpunk style semantic news and search display
  • Paid access for high-volume API calls

Group types

from old wiki

Groups for collaboration on and sharing of conversation, news, code, media, services, etc.

  • Active = Groups as in membership.
    • Who can 'join'?
      • Open = Cost of entry is participation.
      • Closed = Some form of new-member rules.
    • What output can people see?
      • Public = Open process, easily forkable.
      • Private = Group or subgroup curates output, hidden process. Trust?
  • Passive = Groups as in topics of interest.
    • Web of semantically related topics and ideas.
    • Mining and 'routing' of relevant related content


Individual hubs could federate the service they wished (widgets, social aggregation, files, etc) in a manner that could be open or hidden. Tunnelled inter-darknet connections between anonymised users and services.

Process consensus-holders